Industry n/a · SIC —
Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp.
OTF
Latest revenue
$172.6M
as of 2026-03-31
Latest net income
$-219.9M
as of 2026-03-31
Net margin
-127.4%
as of 2026-03-31
Community sentiment
Where do you think OTF is heading?
Keep private notes on OTF — thesis, target price, catalysts to watch.
Visible only to you. Never shared. Never used to train AI.
OTF vs S&P 500 · rebased to 100
Background shading marks the US business-cycle phase at each point in time — early, mid and late expansion, then recession— so you can see which economic backdrop each move happened in. Recessions are NBER-official; expansion sub-phases are ActaClear's editorial dating.
Live market
delayed ≤15 min- Market cap
- $5.10B
- Enterprise value
- $11.52B
- P/E (trailing)
- 7.1×
- Forward P/E
- —
- P/B
- 0.67×
- Dividend yield
- 15.0%
- 52-wk high
- $16.10
- 52-wk low
- $10.52
- Beta
- —
- Shares out
- 462.6M
What this company does
Item 1. Business.Our CompanyBlue Owl Technology Finance Corp. is a Maryland corporation formed on July 12, 2018. We are focused primarily on making loans to, and making debt and equity investments in technology-related, specifically software, companies based primarily in the United States. We originate and invest in senior secured or unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans, and equity-related securities including common equity, warrants, preferred stock and similar forms of senior equity, which may or may not be convertible into a portfolio company’s common equity. Our investment objective is to maximize total return by generating current income from debt investments and…
AI summary unavailable — showing raw filing excerpt
Generated from OTF's filing dated 2026-02-18
Key risks
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP, New York, New York, PCAOB ID 185) F-2 Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 F-4 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 F-4 Consolidated Schedules of Investments as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 F-6 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 F-48 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 F-49 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-51 F-1
AI summary unavailable — showing raw filing excerpt
Generated from OTF's filing dated 2026-02-18
ActaClear Score
Computed from 5 years of SEC fundamentals + latest market data, ranked within industry (4096 peers). 10 = best in industry, 5 = median, 0 = worst. Refreshed Jun 17, 2026.
Fair value · DCF
Methodology + caveats (click to expand)
Method. 10-year forecast of free cash flow, discounted at the company's WACC, with a Gordon-growth terminal at year 10. FCF is proxied by last fiscal-year net income (proper FCF needs CFO − CapEx by year, which we don't store yet). Beta defaults to 1.0 when not reported.
Why DCF is fragile. Treat the output as a thinking aid, not a verdict. Honest weaknesses of any DCF:
- Growth is the dominant assumption. No one can foresee 10 years of growth — small changes in the slider can double or halve fair value. The reverse-DCF readout above tells you what the market is implicitly assuming; ask yourself whether that's realistic before trusting either number.
- Terminal value dominates. In most DCFs, 60-80% of the answer comes from the terminal-value calculation — i.e., everything AFTER year 10. A 0.5pp change in terminal growth, or in WACC, can swing fair value by 20-30%.
- WACC is itself a guess. We use a textbook CAPM cost of equity (Rf 4.3%, MRP 5.5%, β from the quote) plus a 6% pretax cost of debt — none of these are the company's actual marginal financing cost.
- No moat / disruption modelling. The model assumes the company keeps earning whatever it earns today, compounding cleanly. Competitive shifts, regulatory action, and technology disruption can invalidate the forecast overnight.
- Net income ≠ free cash flow. For capex-heavy names (semis, telcos) net income overstates distributable cash. For low-capex names (software) it understates. Both reduce the precision of the FV figure.
- Reflexivity. A high stock price often becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy via better hiring, financing, and customer trust. DCF can't see this.
Take the DCF, the reverse-DCF implied growth, the historical multiples, and the community sentiment together. When they agree, conviction. When they disagree, the disagreement is the most informative thing on the page.